<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ComScore Ranks HandHeld Entertainment #1</title>
	<link>http://zacjohnson.com/comscore-ranks-handheld-entertainment-1/</link>
	<description>Let the Reign Begin</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: funny t shirt slogans</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/comscore-ranks-handheld-entertainment-1/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>funny t shirt slogans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/comscore-ranks-handheld-entertainment-1/#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>The press release "hype" is deceiving.  The only reason that Handheld had the largest percentage increase in unique visitors is because comScore is now measuring ZVUE Networks as a whole, rather than individual websites.  They BOUGHT all those unique visitors.

Overpaying for sites that are losing traffic, revenue and that can easily be replicated is a disastrous business model.  

Paying $17.5m for a site that only makes $1.6m net income a year is just another example of the companies bad decision making skills.  But at least this site purchase actually MAKES money as opposed to most of the previous purchases.

I see &lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=Dorks.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dorks.com&lt;/a&gt; is doing wonderfully since they purchased it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The press release &#8220;hype&#8221; is deceiving.  The only reason that Handheld had the largest percentage increase in unique visitors is because comScore is now measuring ZVUE Networks as a whole, rather than individual websites.  They BOUGHT all those unique visitors.</p>
<p>Overpaying for sites that are losing traffic, revenue and that can easily be replicated is a disastrous business model.  </p>
<p>Paying $17.5m for a site that only makes $1.6m net income a year is just another example of the companies bad decision making skills.  But at least this site purchase actually MAKES money as opposed to most of the previous purchases.</p>
<p>I see <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=Dorks.com" rel="nofollow">Dorks.com</a> is doing wonderfully since they purchased it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
