<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FireFox, Google&#8217;s Super Affiliate!</title>
	<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/</link>
	<description>Let the Reign Begin</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Syed Balkhi</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42288</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Balkhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42288</guid>
		<description>I am still using Internet explorer :p just to tease google ... Not convinced yet to switch ... Only use FF to see the design compatibility as I am a free lancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still using Internet explorer :p just to tease google &#8230; Not convinced yet to switch &#8230; Only use FF to see the design compatibility as I am a free lancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica DeWolf</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42141</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica DeWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42141</guid>
		<description>Great post! I knew Firefox was funded by Google in some way, but I would have never guessed the amount Google hands them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I knew Firefox was funded by Google in some way, but I would have never guessed the amount Google hands them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Confession</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42119</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Confession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-42119</guid>
		<description>Man, $66 million is a huge chunk of change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, $66 million is a huge chunk of change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Round-Up - Week 12 &#124; Thatblogsite dot Com</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Round-Up - Week 12 &#124; Thatblogsite dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41930</guid>
		<description>[...] FireFox, Google&#8217;s Super Affiliate! - Very interesting information on Mozilla&#8217;s relationship with Google! Let&#8217;s just say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] FireFox, Google&#8217;s Super Affiliate! - Very interesting information on Mozilla&#8217;s relationship with Google! Let&#8217;s just say [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista Sidebar Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41929</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista Sidebar Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41929</guid>
		<description>Yes, sorry if I miss-stated my opinion. I was speaking of revenue in general for the Moz Foundation, not just related to the search feature.

Having Google as the default search engine definitely does make sense, since this is what people currently demand (whether or not Moz gets paid for it).

Now, back to my point. I am being critical of the multitude of Tech Corporations (and not of Mozilla) for not investing more heavily into the foundation. Clearly, all of the software Moz provides helps people using and discovering the internet. The corporations should all contribute to the "tip jar" on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sorry if I miss-stated my opinion. I was speaking of revenue in general for the Moz Foundation, not just related to the search feature.</p>
<p>Having Google as the default search engine definitely does make sense, since this is what people currently demand (whether or not Moz gets paid for it).</p>
<p>Now, back to my point. I am being critical of the multitude of Tech Corporations (and not of Mozilla) for not investing more heavily into the foundation. Clearly, all of the software Moz provides helps people using and discovering the internet. The corporations should all contribute to the &#8220;tip jar&#8221; on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41923</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41923</guid>
		<description>"Having more than half your funding coming from 1 company is a start, but no long term strategy. "

You make it sound like some kind of underwriting. It's not. It's a revenue relationship with a search company based on user traffic and actions. Any of the other major search companies would happily pay for the default position in Firefox. We go with Google because it's the best, not because it's the only option.  If it stops being the best, we'll move to a different one and probably have an equally positive revenue arrangement with that company. 

The point is that the revenue generating feature is about search, not about any one search company. I'd get it if you suggested that we should be looking into other incomes unrelated to search, but it's not about Google, it's about the feature.

Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Having more than half your funding coming from 1 company is a start, but no long term strategy. &#8221;</p>
<p>You make it sound like some kind of underwriting. It&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s a revenue relationship with a search company based on user traffic and actions. Any of the other major search companies would happily pay for the default position in Firefox. We go with Google because it&#8217;s the best, not because it&#8217;s the only option.  If it stops being the best, we&#8217;ll move to a different one and probably have an equally positive revenue arrangement with that company. </p>
<p>The point is that the revenue generating feature is about search, not about any one search company. I&#8217;d get it if you suggested that we should be looking into other incomes unrelated to search, but it&#8217;s not about Google, it&#8217;s about the feature.</p>
<p>Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista Sidebar Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41913</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista Sidebar Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41913</guid>
		<description>I think it's a good thing that Mozilla is getting such a big amount of money from Google. All Mozilla has to do now is get a list of other big companies willing to contribute funding. Having more than half your funding coming from 1 company is a start, but no long term strategy. 

Still, my hat is off to the good Mozilla folks, who brought us so many improvements in Open Source, and awesome free software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a good thing that Mozilla is getting such a big amount of money from Google. All Mozilla has to do now is get a list of other big companies willing to contribute funding. Having more than half your funding coming from 1 company is a start, but no long term strategy. </p>
<p>Still, my hat is off to the good Mozilla folks, who brought us so many improvements in Open Source, and awesome free software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41874</guid>
		<description>Fire Fox is the best. I always use it. IE is just...waste lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fire Fox is the best. I always use it. IE is just&#8230;waste lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41872</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41872</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41871</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zacjohnson.com/firefox-googles-super-affiliate/#comment-41871</guid>
		<description>Waste for me now. Referrals are closing for non US publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waste for me now. Referrals are closing for non US publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
