Comments on: Review Me Blogs

By: diamond girl

diamond girl — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:59:56 +0000

I hate to say it but these blogs just look like bad neighborhoods. There are many ways this could be done right, but any network I see is full of blogs that do nothing but turn themselves into prostitutes and loose ability to bass link weight.

By: http://affiliateelite.host-page.com

http://affiliateelite.host-page.com — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:22:14 +0000

http://affiliateelite.host-page.com…

Top affiliate internet marketing super articles may take a bit of effort to locate….

By: pagerank check

pagerank check — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:29:47 +0000

pagerank check…

I found a very handy little tool to check your pagerank on http://www.pr-boost.com . It also contains some good information about pagerank en seo. Must see!…

By: David Wilkinson

David Wilkinson — Tue, 29 May 2007 16:11:32 +0000

No offence to Dmitri, but that review kinda sucked.

You paid $150 for it!!??!

By: Bob Jones

Bob Jones — Mon, 28 May 2007 13:10:22 +0000

Assuming that you forked out $500+ (you probably had more reviews done than the three mentioned) I cannot see how this has helped your blog to be honest and would consider it a waste of money. My blog is three months old and although your alexa ranking is higher and you have 50 more readers, your technorati rank is over 60k while I got it down to 15k
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not slagging your blog, I have paid $30 myself to get three reviewme’s done to test the market. All I am saying is that it seems that getting reviews for a blog is just not worth it?
And now, I’m gonna have a browse through your site

By: Alternate Realities - May 28, 2007

Alternate Realities - May 28, 2007 — Mon, 28 May 2007 11:54:52 +0000

[...] Johnson wrote a review on a ReviewMe review he paid $150 for. It was fairly critical but that wasn’t the reason for the post. Simple [...]

By: Sara

Sara — Fri, 25 May 2007 12:50:47 +0000

I can't believe you had to pay $150 for that. What a load of junk. It cracks me up that they "accuse" you of paying over $1,000,000 to your own affiliates. Obviously you're making good money if you can do that. What an idiot. This just backs up your point that ReviewMe really needs to have a function to rate reviewers.

Sara

By: Matt Huggins

Matt Huggins — Thu, 24 May 2007 12:53:03 +0000

My site is still growing — my Technorati rank is only about 140,000 — and I've completed some $5-10 reviews through PayPerPost and ReviewMe's marketplace in the past. I was disappointed to find that there are other sites making $60+ for reviews requested of them (not even review opportunities they found themselves) that were providing much less information in their reviews.

Now not all of my reviews are greatly in-depth for $5-10, but I do take the time to get a feel for the site, request additional information when available, and so forth. Meanwhile, there are bloggers like this one who are getting paid 10-30x what I'm receiving while not even taking the time to understand what they're writing about.

Sorry for the lengthy rant. I'm just trying to say that I agree with your analysis that you don't always get what you pay for (but on the contrary, sometimes you get more than you expect).

By: Chee Kui

Chee Kui — Thu, 24 May 2007 08:27:06 +0000

Hi Zac

Yikes, for $150, that review is the crappiest thing I have ever read. I think ReviewMe should implement something to allow advertisers to rate their reviewers.

By: Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 23 May 2007 20:45:48 +0000

from reading kumikos review of this website ive decided to purchase one from her myself.

zac i'll give you a fair review