Comments on: ReviewMe vs. PayPerPost

By: Jess

Jess — Mon, 07 May 2007 20:46:38 +0000

Nice review, I really like how you compared both of them! The post was very well written and organized, thanks.

By: Business Twins

Business Twins — Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:26 +0000

I have another blog, and even though you may not receive a lot of quality reviews from higher PR sites, you still get a link of your anchor text. So it helps somewhat. A little here and there adds up.

For instance, I just signed up for PPP as a blogger for my PR 4 personal blog, and I hope to start reviewing in the next week.

By: Community Building B

Community Building B — Mon, 07 May 2007 12:26:50 +0000

Thanks for a good comparison of the two offerings. It seems like you really do get what you pay for – if you just want to increase the number of links back to you blog, perhaps $5 a go is worth it.

If you want a decent review of your blog, you simply have to pay for the quality.

- Martin Reed

By: Steve Yu

Steve Yu — Mon, 07 May 2007 07:49:59 +0000

well, your review don't talk much about what this blog about, from the beginning till the end, the point that i captured in the review is about Zac's review promotion. For every 10 reviews Zac receive, he will give away $50 to one lucky person.So does it worth Zac for you to spend $10 to get this lousy review?

P. S. : no offence… just tell you what I wanted to tell

By: Erik Karey

Erik Karey — Mon, 07 May 2007 06:28:01 +0000

Good analysis, any thoughts about reviewing any of the other paid blog posting services?

By: Yuancheng

Yuancheng — Mon, 07 May 2007 00:40:23 +0000

Oooops, although I'm writing in Chinese, my readers could read English too. So, I dont think let blogger using other language review ur blog is a bad idea. It can spread ur blog to more people which could read English but not treat English as the primary acquiring information's way.